…Take, for example, what I said/predicted last Sunday. The day of the latest Jew-killing in Jerusalem, the drive by shooter who killed two and wounded six. Up for discussion was the State Department’s unusually harsh tongue-lashing over building 98 new homes for Jews on barren ground displacing no alleged ancient Arabian. In the matter of that day’s ritual sacrifice of Jews and their suicidal assassin, I said, “I doubt that tomorrow we will read of similar harsh remarks from Washington and Brussels directed this time at Fatah for declaring the savage a martyr, a hero, a holy man.”

That is what I said last Sunday, and this is what the State did say. It referred to a “terrorist attack in Jerusalem, that took the lives of two Israelis….deepest condolences to the families of those killed… (and) there is absolutely no justification for the taking of innocent lives. We also condemn the statements glorifying this reprehensible and cowardly attack.”

Time for some classical deprogramming here. As I point out in book, here is a statement, so typical of UN resolutions, that mentions Israelis but identities no other nationality. We read the State Department “condemns the statements glorifying this reprehensible and cowardly attack.”

The statements are condemned but those who made them are unidentified…